Case 1807225/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Wiggles and Giggles Nursery Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1807225/2022
- Decision date
- 28 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge James JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 response, and Employment Judge James determined the claim under rule 21 without a hearing. The tribunal also amended the respondent name to Wiggles and Giggles Nursery Limited. On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant three days' wages, notice pay and redundancy pay.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded three days' unpaid wages at £76 per day. | Upheld | — | £228 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded two weeks' notice pay at £380 per week; this is the notice pay element referred to in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £760 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal awarded one week's redundancy pay at £380 per week. | Upheld | — | £380 |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed because the claimant was not able to recall how much holiday she had taken at the time of dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,368
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.