Case 1807227/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Currie v BM Retail Limited (In Administration) Heard: BY CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807227/2020
- Decision date
- 2 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Currie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 2 August 2021 Employment Judge JM Wade gave a Rule 21 judgment after no response had been presented by the respondent and the administrator had consented to the claim proceeding on 22 February 2021. After discussing the claim details with Mrs Currie and her assessment of financial losses, the tribunal said it had sufficient information to determine the case. The claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract succeeded. Any other complaints indicated in the claim form were dismissed as outside the tribunal's jurisdiction or misconceived.
The tribunal noted that there was no claim for a protective award in the claim form and said that, had such a claim been presented, the facts described suggested it would have had little or no prospects of success. On remedy, no basic award was made because the claimant had received a statutory redundancy payment from the Insolvency Service. The respondent was ordered to pay a compensatory award of £4,500, the recoupment regulations did not apply, and no separate awards were made for the other claims because any other sums had been paid by the Insolvency Service or were included in the compensatory award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Any other complaints indicated in the claim form were dismissed as outside the tribunal's jurisdiction or misconceived; the judgment does not identify them individually. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,500
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.