Case 1807231/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Kerr v BM Retail Limited (In Administration) Heard: BY CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807231/2020
- Decision date
- 3 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Kerr
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Kerr brought her claim against BM Retail Limited (In Administration) and the matter was heard remotely on 3 August 2021 before Employment Judge JM Wade. No response had been presented by the return date, and the administrator consented to the claim proceeding on 22 February 2021. The judge heard sworn evidence from the claimant and determined the claim under Rule 21.
The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded. The unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract complaints were not pursued and were dismissed. Any other complaints indicated in the claim form were dismissed as outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction or misconceived.
On remedy, the tribunal made no basic award because the claimant had already received a statutory redundancy payment from the Insolvency Service. It awarded £500 compensatory compensation to reflect loss of statutory rights only. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had secured new employment, which wholly mitigated her losses, and for that reason she did not pursue arrears of pay or damages for breach of contract. The judgment also noted that there was no protective award claim in the claim form and that, even if one had been presented, the described facts suggested it would have had little or no prospects of success. The recoupment regulations did not apply to the award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment; the complaint of unfair dismissal was found well founded and succeeded. The compensatory award of £500 was made for loss of statutory rights only. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant did not pursue this complaint and it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant did not pursue this complaint and it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Any other complaints indicated in the claim form were dismissed as outside the jurisdiction of the Tribunal or misconceived; the extracted text does not identify them individually. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £500
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.