Case 1807240/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A J Lock v G K Retail Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1807240/2020
- Decision date
- 23 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr K Smith, Mr M Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A J Lock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Leeds before Employment Judge Miller with Mr K Smith and Mr M Lewis, recorded that Ms A J Lock’s claim of unfair constructive dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. Her claim of direct discrimination because of disability under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was also unsuccessful and dismissed, as was her claim of discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010.
The claimant’s claim that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments was successful. The written judgment does not set out the tribunal’s detailed reasons in the extracted text, but the outcome recorded is that the reasonable adjustments complaint succeeded while the direct discrimination and s.15 claims did not.
The claimant’s breach of contract claim, which was identified as a failure to pay notice pay, was dismissed. Her claim for payment of holiday pay accrued on termination of employment was successful.
Remedy was not determined in this judgment; the tribunal stated that remedy would be decided at a subsequent hearing. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Claim pleaded as unfairly constructively dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination because of disability under s.13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for breach of contract, identified as failure to pay notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for payment of holiday pay accrued on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.