Case 1807243/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Sloan v Romac Logistics Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1807243/2024
- Decision date
- 20 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Sloan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr T Sloan's claim against Romac Logistics Ltd after concluding that it had not been actively pursued and that there had been a failure to comply with directions. The reasons record that, by letters dated 20 February 2025 and 26 March 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The judgment therefore states that the claim was struck out. The decision was approved by Employment Judge Lancaster on 3 June 2025. No substantive findings on the merits and no monetary award are recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out for failure to comply with directions and because it had not been actively pursued. The reasons do not identify the underlying cause(s) of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.