Case 1807246/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Whitehead v Amore Residential Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807246/2020
- Decision date
- 9 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Whitehead
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Brain recorded that Amore Residential Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms J Whitehead’s wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,260.54 gross, described as seven days’ pay due for work undertaken by the claimant in the first week of September 2020.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £180.07 gross. The judgment directed that payment of both sums be made on or before 25 March 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,260.54, described as seven days’ pay due for work undertaken in the first week of September 2020. | Upheld | — | £1,261 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £180.07. | Upheld | — | £180 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,441
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.