Case 1807251/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M. Horsfall v Media Displays Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1807251/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flanagan
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M. Horsfall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Leeds Employment Tribunal on 4 April 2023, Employment Judge Flanagan sat alone. The claimant, Mr M. Horsfall, appeared in person and there was no attendance or representation for the respondent, Media Displays Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation).
The tribunal held that the claim for unpaid wages and failure to pay notice pay was well founded. It found that the claimant was due £693 in unpaid wages and £233.20 for notice pay, making a total award of £926.20.
The claimant's claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. No further reasoning, legal test, or additional remedy calculation was recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unpaid wages well founded and awarded £693. | Upheld | — | £693 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claim for failure to pay notice pay well founded and awarded £233.20. | Upheld | — | £233 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £926
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.