Case 1807261/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Street-Bailey v Wiggles and Giggles Nursery Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1807261/2022
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss K Street-Bailey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 23 December 2022. The respondents did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The first respondent’s name was amended to add “Nursery Ltd”.
The tribunal upheld three claims against the first respondent. It found that the first respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £146.88 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered payment of £293.76 gross. Finally, it found that the first respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £734.40 gross. Any claims against the second respondent were left to be addressed at the hearing listed for 30 March 2023.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £147 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Award stated as the gross amount for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £294 |
| Holiday pay | Award stated as the gross amount for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £734 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,175
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.