Case 1807265/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Ghalpin First v Nadeem Khalid Second Respondent: N K Property Empire Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807265/2020
- Decision date
- 15 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Ghalpin First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant's claims for unauthorised deduction from wages and breach of contract against the first respondent were well founded. It awarded £2,092.80 for wages said to be properly payable for the period 1 October to 7 November 2020, and £409.84 for 47 hours of accrued but untaken holiday pay owed in respect of holiday accrued between 1 September and 7 November 2020.
On the contractual claim, the tribunal awarded £383.68, described as one week's pay, because the claimant resigned with immediate effect on 7 November 2020 in circumstances where he was entitled to resign in response to the first respondent's fundamental breach of contract and treat himself as having been dismissed. It also awarded £1,534.72, described as four weeks' pay, for the first respondent's failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment.
The tribunal found that the claimant was employed by the first respondent and was not employed by the second respondent, so the claims against the second respondent were dismissed. The total gross sum owed by the first respondent was £4,421.04, payable on or before 22 December 2021.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld against the first respondent. The tribunal awarded £2,092.80 for wages for the period 1 October to 7 November 2020 and £409.84 for 47 hours of accrued but untaken holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £2,503 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld against the first respondent. The tribunal awarded £383.68, equivalent to one week's pay, because the claimant resigned with immediate effect on 7 November 2020 in response to the first respondent's fundamental breach of contract and was entitled to treat himself as dismissed. | Upheld | — | £384 |
| Other | Awarded against the first respondent for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment. The tribunal awarded £1,534.72, described as four weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,535 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,421
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.