Case 1807291/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Mr. Whittle, Operations Manager — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807291/2019
- Decision date
- 27 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Jack Johnson brought claims against Geo Sites Surveys Limited. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's automatically unfair dismissal claim succeeded and that the claimant's unlawful deduction claim also succeeded.
The judgment then recorded an award of holiday pay and statutory sick pay of £786.55, and a compensatory award of £3,221.01. The extract does not break down the £786.55 between holiday pay and statutory sick pay, or set out any additional apportionment between the two successful claims.
No further reasoning, legal test, or remedy calculation is set out in the extracted text beyond those outcomes and figures.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's automatically unfair dismissal claim succeeds. The extract does not give further reasoning for the dismissal claim. | Upheld | — | £3,221 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's unlawful deduction claim succeeds and records an award of holiday pay and statutory sick pay of £786.55. The extract does not split that figure between those components. | Upheld | — | £787 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £787
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,221
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.