Case 1807319/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Marfell, lay representative v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807319/2019
- Decision date
- 10 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss Marfell, lay representative
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in Leeds on 10 February 2020 before Employment Judge Cox. The parties were Mr J Jordan, the Claimant, and Awesome Merchandise Limited, the Respondent. Miss Marfell appeared for the Claimant as a lay representative and Miss Hill appeared for the Respondent as solicitor.
The only claim identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The judgment states that the claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. No substantive findings on liability are recorded because the claim did not proceed to a determination on the merits.
No remedy was awarded and the judgment records no monetary figures. The decision is dated 10 February 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant at a preliminary hearing on 10 February 2020. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.