Case 1807342/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Chester v Nevison Pharmacy Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807342/2019
- Decision date
- 19 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Chester
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis Rule 21 judgment records three successful monetary claims by Ms D Chester against Nevison Pharmacy Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £730.69. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £197.04 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £267.35. The judgment does not set out detailed reasons beyond those orders, and it is limited to the stated sums.
The total amount ordered to be paid was £1,195.08.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £731 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £197.04. | Upheld | — | £197 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders £267.35. | Upheld | — | £267 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,195
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.