Case 1807343/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v J T Fabrications Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807343/2019
- Decision date
- 18 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Licorish Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Cordingley brought a complaint of unlawful deductions from wages against J T Fabrications Limited. The tribunal recorded that the correct name of the respondent was J T Fabrications Limited and that the hearing took place in Leeds on 13 March 2020 before Employment Judge Licorish, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance for the respondent.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s complaint was not validly presented within the relevant time limit, the date of termination of his employment being 12 July 2019. It further found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within the time limit. On that basis, the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the complaint.
The claim of unlawful deduction from wages was therefore dismissed. No compensatory or other monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the complaint was not validly presented within the relevant time limit, found that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time, and therefore concluded it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.