Case 1807349/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Marren v Oakworth Manor Residential Home Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807349/2019
- Decision date
- 17 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Marren
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds on 17 February 2020 before Employment Judge Brain, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not attending. The tribunal recorded a single finding: the respondent was in breach of contract because it failed to pay the claimant her contractual holiday pay entitlement for the period of her employment.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £757.36 on or before 2 March 2020. No separate findings were recorded on other heads of claim, and the judgment does not identify any discrimination issues, legal tests, or additional remedy components beyond the holiday pay sum awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay the claimant her contractual holiday pay entitlement for the period of her employment. | Upheld | — | £757 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £757
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £757
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.