Case 1807356/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Mudd v Precious Passionate Care — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807356/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rostant Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Mudd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letters dated 18 February 2021 and 25 February 2021, the tribunal gave Mr A Mudd an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37.
The judgment records that the hearing fixed for 1 March 2021 would not take place. No merits findings were made and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim as not actively pursued; it did not determine the merits of the breach of contract complaint separately. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim as not actively pursued; it did not determine the merits of the unlawful deduction from wages complaint separately. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.