Case 1807361/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807361/2020
- Decision date
- 12 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Mr G Corbett, Ms V Griggs
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat remotely by CVP on 5 to 7 October 2021 before Employment Judge JM Wade, with Mr G Corbett and Ms V Griggs as the lay members. In its unanimous judgment, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's second allegation of section 15 discrimination succeeded.
The judgment also recorded that the claimant's further Equality Act complaints were dismissed. The extracted text does not set out the full list of those additional complaints, so only the successful section 15 disability discrimination allegation can be identified with confidence from the available text.
No remedy figures are stated in the extracted judgment text. The decision was sent to the parties on 12 October 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal stated that the claimant's second allegation of section 15 discrimination succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Other | The tribunal stated that the claimant's further Equality Act complaints were dismissed, but the extracted text does not specify each separate statutory label. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.