Case 1807364/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Convery v Bristol Street Fourth Investments Limited. AT A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807364/2020
- Decision date
- 15 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Convery
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing heard by telephone conference call on 15 March 2021 before Employment Judge Lancaster. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr S Duncanson, solicitor. The hearing was conducted remotely on the papers by consent, and the tribunal recorded that a face-to-face hearing was not practicable.
The judgment records that the complaint of unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed upon withdrawal. It also records that the complaint that the dismissal was discriminatory would proceed. The decision does not make merits findings on the discrimination complaint and does not record any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.