Case 1807369/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Milner v Dugdale Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807369/2019
- Decision date
- 24 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Milner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 16 June 2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing to make representations. The tribunal said this was because the claimant had not complied with paragraph 1 of the order dated 7 April 2020, had failed to reply to the tribunal's letter of 4 June 2020, and had not actively pursued the claim.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Brain struck out the claim on 24 June 2020. The judgment records that the hearing fixed for 28 August 2020 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after the claimant failed to make written representations or request a hearing in response to the letter dated 16 June 2020. The reasons given were failure to comply with paragraph 1 of the order dated 7 April 2020, failure to reply to the tribunal's letter of 4 June 2020, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.