Case 1807394/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Netherton v Jhoots Pharmacy Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1807394/2020
- Decision date
- 17 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McAvoy Newns
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Netherton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJhoots Pharmacy Limited conceded the claimant's claims for RX compliance deductions and for a shortfall in wages. The tribunal upheld the RX compliance claim only for the outstanding balance of £34.52, after the claimant accepted that the remaining sums had been paid, and upheld the shortfall claim in full at £1,110.84.
The holiday pay claim was clarified at hearing as relating to annual leave allegedly taken on 25 and 26 December 2018 and on 12 and 13 September 2019. For the December 2018 element, the tribunal found the claim was presented significantly outside the three-month time limit because the expected payment date was around 10 January 2019, and the later October 2019 claim did not form part of a series with the September 2019 deduction under Bear Scotland because the gap was more than three months. The tribunal also found it was reasonably practicable to present that part in time and declined to extend time.
For the September 2019 element, the tribunal accepted that the claim was in time but held that the claimant had not proved on the balance of probabilities that she was on holiday on 12 and 13 September 2019. The attendance register note referring to "2 days holiday 12+13" was treated as unreliable because the same record showed her as being at work on 3 September 2019, which she said was also annual leave. The holiday pay claim was therefore dismissed. The total gross award was £1,145.36.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | RX compliance deductions. The respondent conceded liability, and the claimant said all outstanding sums had been paid except £34.52, which the tribunal awarded. | Upheld | — | £35 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Shortfall in wages from 14 July 2018 to 15 January 2020. The respondent conceded this claim, and the tribunal awarded £1,110.84. | Upheld | — | £1,111 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim as clarified at hearing: alleged unpaid annual leave for 25 and 26 December 2018 and 12 and 13 September 2019. The December 2018 element was out of time and time was not extended; the September 2019 element was in time but was not proved on the evidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,145
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.13(1) ERA 1996
- s.23(2) ERA 1996
- s.23(3) ERA 1996
- s.23(4) ERA 1996
- Bear Scotland Ltd v Fulton series of deductions
- Porter v Bainbridge
- Palmer reasonably practicable test
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.