Case 1807421/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Bates v Computershare Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1807421/2020
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Bates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing, the tribunal considered the claimant’s complaint that the respondent had breached the duty to make reasonable adjustments. It found that the complaint had been presented outside the limitation period in section 123 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal also found that it was not just and equitable to extend time so as to give the tribunal jurisdiction to hear the claim. No merits findings or remedy were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found the complaint about breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments was presented outside the limitation period in section 123 of the Equality Act 2010 and refused to extend time on a just and equitable basis. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.