Case 1807425/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O O’Donnell v Whisperdale Sporting Club Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807425/2019
- Decision date
- 19 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O O’Donnell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge D N Jones found that Mr O’Donnell was unfairly dismissed by Whisperdale Sporting Club Limited. The tribunal awarded compensation for unfair dismissal of £1,807.68, made up of a basic award of £1,307.68 and a compensatory award of £500 for loss of statutory rights. The judgment records that the claimant had six continuous years’ service, a gross weekly wage of £326.92, and was 24 years old at the effective date of termination.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,028.30. The judgment explains this figure by reference to the sums £4,250, £2,777.36, and £659.75, less £3,323.51, described as the grossed-up equivalent of net wages paid of £2,658.81. In addition, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, but held that he had mitigated his losses and so awarded no damages on that claim.
On the remaining claims, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £723.40. It also found that the respondent had failed to provide written particulars of employment and ordered payment of £653.84, described as two weeks’ pay. The total of the monetary awards recorded in the judgment is £8,213.22.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair and awarded a basic award of £1,307.68 and a compensatory award of £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £1,808 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,028.30, described as £4,250 + £2,777.36 + £659.75 - £3,323.51 (the grossed-up equivalent of net wages paid of £2,658.81). | Upheld | — | £5,028 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice, but said the claimant mitigated his losses and was therefore not entitled to damages for the breach. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £723.40. | Upheld | — | £723 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to provide written particulars of employment and ordered payment of £653.84, described as two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £654 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,213
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,308
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.