Case 1807428/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1807428/2020
- Decision date
- 16 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Ms J Blesic, Mr A Senior
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat remotely by CVP on 16 September 2021 before Employment Judge JM Wade, with Ms J Blesic and Mr A Senior as lay members. It dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint because she did not have two years' service.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's disability discrimination complaints for failure to make reasonable adjustments and direct discrimination. However, the claimant's section 15 complaint, discrimination arising from disability, succeeded.
The parties did not ask the tribunal to determine remedy because they agreed that the respondent would pay the claimant a composite sum of £12,000 within 28 days. The judgment records that the recoupment regulations do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for want of two years' service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant's failure to make reasonable adjustments complaint was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant's direct discrimination complaint was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant's section 15 complaint, discrimination arising from disability, succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.