Case 1807548/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Healy, of Counsel v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807548/2019
- Decision date
- 15 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Healy, of Counsel
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote preliminary hearing on 15 April 2020, Employment Judge JM Wade dealt with jurisdiction and limitation issues in Mr A Booth's case against Delstar International Ltd t/a SWM International. The claimant's pleaded Equality Act complaints were described as disability discrimination complaints arising from a failure to apply for income protection benefit, refusal to allow family members to attend grievance meetings, and an alleged attempt to dismiss him, alongside an unlawful deduction from wages complaint about pension contributions.
The tribunal held that the claimant had complied with section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 and that the early conciliation steps were sufficient despite the different names used for the respondent. It also concluded that it was just and equitable to extend time to 20 December 2019 for the complaints linked to factual allegations 1 to 3, taking into account the length and reasons for delay, the claimant's reliance on internal grievance and union advice, the absence of demonstrated prejudice to the respondent, and the fact that the claimant was disabled during the relevant period.
The unlawful deduction from wages complaint was dismissed because it was withdrawn before the judge. The hearing did not determine the substantive merits of the Equality Act complaints, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deduction from wages complaint, which concerned pension contributions, was dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal at the preliminary hearing on 15 April 2020. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal extended time to 20 December 2019 for the Equality Act complaints tied to factual allegations 1 to 3: failure to apply for income protection benefit, refusal to allow family members to accompany the claimant at grievance meetings, and an alleged attempt to dismiss him. No substantive merits decision was made at this hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.