Case 1807605/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Broderick v BaxterStorey Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807605/2019
- Decision date
- 6 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT SENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Broderick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a rule 52 judgment on withdrawal. It records Miss N Broderick as claimant and BaxterStorey Limited as respondent, and states that the proceedings are dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
No findings on the merits of the unfair dismissal or breach of contract claims are recorded, and no remedy or monetary award is made. The judgment was dated 06/03/2020 and sent to the parties on 06/03/2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category, as the one-page judgment itself does not separately describe the claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category, as the one-page judgment itself does not separately describe the claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.