Case 1807609/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Steele v Whitelock Developments Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1807609/2023
- Decision date
- 20 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Steele
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent failed to present a response to the claim, and the tribunal determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure on the information available. Employment Judge Davies found the Claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal, together with his claim for pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday, to be well-founded and to succeed.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay notice pay of £6,000 (grossed up as post-employment notice pay, calculated as 8 x £750), a basic award of £7,716 (based on the capped weekly pay of £643, 8 complete years' service, and age 60 at dismissal), and a compensatory award of £2,892 (4 additional weeks' loss at the net weekly equivalent of £598, plus £500 for loss of statutory rights). A 25% ACAS uplift of £4,152 was applied on the basis of what the tribunal described as a sham disciplinary process conducted knowing the Claimant was on leave, and a failure to deal with his appeal.
The total sum payable was £20,760, with the Claimant responsible for any tax due. The tribunal noted that the Claimant had not included any sum for accrued but untaken holiday in his calculation, so no figure was awarded under that head.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award £7,716 plus compensatory award £2,892. ACAS uplift of 25% (£4,152) applied across all sums and not split per claim in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £10,608 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Notice pay of 8 x £750 = £6,000, grossed up to reflect post-employment notice pay tax. | Upheld | — | £6,000 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday recorded as well-founded, but the tribunal noted the Claimant had not included any sum for it in his calculation; no monetary award was made for this head. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,760
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,716
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,892
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.