Case 1807612/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Reynolds v Network Rail Infrastructure Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807612/2019
- Decision date
- 18 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr DC Dowse, Mr M Elwen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Reynolds
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant's complaints of discrimination arising from disability were well founded in two respects: restricted duties from 18 September 2020 and the prohibition on his driving from May 2020. Those complaints succeeded.
The claimant's remaining complaints of discrimination arising from disability failed and were dismissed. His complaints of direct disability discrimination also failed and were dismissed.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay compensation for unlawful discrimination of £7,000 for injury to feelings, with £646.15 interest, making a total award of £7,646.15.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaints of discrimination arising from disability succeeded in respect of restricted duties from 18 September 2020 and the prohibition on driving from May 2020. | Upheld | Disability | £7,646 |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant's remaining complaints of discrimination arising from disability failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant's complaints of direct disability discrimination failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,646
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.