Case 1807631/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Parker v R1: Humber Bridge Country Hotel Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation) R2: Mr Thomas Hazeldine — 2020
- Case reference
- 1807631/2019
- Decision date
- 30 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Parker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on withdrawal dated 30 July 2020 before Employment Judge Maidment. The document identifies the claimant as Miss D Parker and the respondents as Humber Bridge Country Hotel Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation) and Mr Thomas Hazeldine.
The only operative decision recorded is that the proceedings against the Second Respondent were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment does not set out any findings on the underlying merits of the dispute and does not specify the substantive causes of action being withdrawn in relation to the Second Respondent.
No remedy, liability finding, or allocation of compensation is recorded in the text provided. The judgment is a withdrawal disposal only, and it gives no further factual or legal analysis beyond the dismissal of the proceedings against the Second Respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the proceedings against the Second Respondent were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not identify the substantive claim type or record any merits decision. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.