Case 1807809/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. E Njie v Amazon Flex Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1807809/2023
- Decision date
- 27 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. E Njie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 hearing before Employment Judge Buckley on 27 February 2024. The respondent did not attend and had filed no response. The claimant also did not attend. The tribunal decided it was in the interests of justice to proceed in the claimant's absence.
On the information in the claim form, the tribunal was satisfied that £162.50 was properly payable to the claimant under his contract of employment and had not been paid. It therefore found an unlawful deduction from wages in that sum and ordered the respondent to pay £162.50.
The tribunal noted that although the claimant said he had been unable to pay his rent, he had not claimed any consequential financial loss. It found there was no claim for consequential financial loss and stated that the recoupment regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 hearing. The tribunal found that £162.50 was properly payable under the claimant's contract of employment and had not been paid. | Upheld | — | £163 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £163
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £163
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.