Case 1807900/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr Fish, Director — 2024
- Case reference
- 1807900/2023
- Decision date
- 21 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in Leeds before Employment Judge Cox on 21 March 2024. The respondent's name was amended to W Cropper Ltd t/a Fourway Coaches. The judgment records that, by consent, the respondent would pay the claimant £521.60 in accrued holiday pay due on termination of employment.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's claim of unauthorised deduction from wages failed and was dismissed. No separate monetary award was made for that claim in the judgment.
The claimant's claim for damages for wrongful dismissal also failed and was dismissed. The judgment does not record any further findings on liability beyond those outcome statements, and the only monetary sum in the order is the agreed holiday pay payment of £521.60.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | By consent, the Respondent was ordered to pay £521.60 in accrued holiday pay due on termination of employment. | Settled | — | £522 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim of unauthorised deduction from wages failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claim for damages for wrongful dismissal failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £522
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.