Case 1808003/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Reast v Ecotrans UK Recycling Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808003/2023
- Decision date
- 7 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Reast
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard that, on termination of the claimant's employment following his resignation, the respondent deducted £275.08 from his final wage. The respondent said the claimant had taken 16 days holiday when only 12.7 days had accrued, and it rounded the balance down to three days and deducted three days' pay.
The claimant's evidence, supported by his wage slips, was that he had only taken 11 days holiday. The tribunal accepted that the five days shown on wage slips in April and May 2023 as 'holiday pay' were in fact additional pay for five bank holidays that he had been told to work, rather than holiday taken.
Once the respondent accepted at the hearing that the claimant had only taken 11 days holiday, the tribunal found that the deduction was unauthorised because the factual basis relied on by the respondent was incorrect. Judgment was therefore entered for the claimant for £275.08.
The tribunal noted that the claimant was in fact due 1.7 days' pay from the respondent, but an application to amend the claim to include a claim for 1.7 days accrued but unpaid holiday was refused. The judge said it was highly likely the claim could and should have been brought in the original claim form, so the amendment was rejected.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent deducted £275.08 from the claimant's final wage on the basis that he had taken three days more holiday than accrued. The tribunal found that factual basis was wrong and that the claimant had in fact taken 11 days holiday. An application to amend the claim to add a separate claim for 1.7 days accrued but unpaid holiday was refused. | Upheld | — | £275 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £275
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.