Case 1808021/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Shambare v Social Work England Heard at Leeds by CVP — 2026
- Case reference
- 1808021/2025
- Decision date
- 14 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Shambare
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms E Shambare, brought a single claim for unauthorised deduction of wages against Social Work England, seeking £7,000 said to relate to a period between 12 December 2024 and 2 May 2025 during which she did not practise while awaiting completion of her annual re-registration as a social worker. She had applied for re-registration on 12 December 2024, after the 30 November deadline, and it was not completed until 2 May 2025; the Tribunal also recorded that she had failed to submit a required piece of CPD.
The central issues were the identity of the claimant's employer and whether that employer owed her wages. The claimant accepted at the hearing that Social Work England was not her employer and that her employer at the material time was Manchester City Council. She maintained, however, that any loss was attributable to Social Work England rather than to Manchester City Council.
Employment Judge Shulman declined to dismiss Social Work England from the proceedings or to substitute Manchester City Council as respondent, on the basis that Manchester City Council was clearly not liable and that joining it would not advance the claimant's position. The claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was accordingly dismissed, and the Tribunal advised the claimant to take advice as to whether she might have a non-employment claim against Social Work England.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim was for £7,000 said to be owed during a gap in social work re-registration (12 December 2024 to 2 May 2025). The claimant accepted that the named respondent, Social Work England, was not her employer; her employer was Manchester City Council. The Tribunal declined to substitute Manchester City Council, finding it clearly not liable, and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.