Case 1808024/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Margaret Hanson v Turning Point (Registered Charity & Company Limited by Guarantee) RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808024/2023
- Decision date
- 13 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Margaret Hanson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 11 April 2024, Employment Judge R S Drake considered whether Mrs Margaret Hanson's unfair dismissal claim was in time under section 111(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 14 July 2023, that ACAS early conciliation ran from 26 September 2023 to 11 October 2023, and that the extended primary limitation period expired on 11 November 2023. The ET1 was presented on 13 November 2023, so the claim was two days late.
Mrs Hanson relied on stress, an eye complaint diagnosed in January 2023, and the fact that she was awaiting settlement discussions through ACAS and had support from a friend, Ms Isaac. The tribunal accepted that she had the eye complaint and had access to ACAS and other advice, but found no evidence of a debility that prevented her from completing and lodging the claim. It also noted that she had been able to represent herself at an investigative meeting, disciplinary hearings, an appeal hearing, and in the incorporation process for a company.
Applying the authorities it cited, including Porter v Bandridge Ltd, Palmer v Southend BC, Sterling v United Learning Trust, Asda Stores Plc v Kauser, Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd, and Marks & Spencer Plc v Williams-Ryan, the tribunal held that the claimant had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. It found the delay unexplained or unsatisfactorily explained, concluded that any misadvice from skilled advisers would not assist on the facts found, and dismissed the unfair dismissal claim for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Held out of time under s.111(2) ERA 1996; ET1 presented on 13 November 2023, two days after the extended primary period expired on 11 November 2023. The tribunal found it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.111(2) ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- Palmer v Southend BC
- Sterling v United Learning Trust
- Asda Stores Plc v Kauser
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd
- Marks & Spencer Plc v Williams-Ryan
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.