Case 1808051/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Simpson, Miss D Robinson v Dandis Diner Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808051/2023
- Decision date
- 19 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Simpson, Miss D Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThese claims were issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 8 January 2024. The case was determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time.
The tribunal held that it was just and equitable for both claimants to receive a redundancy payment under section 164(2)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It therefore ordered the respondent, Dandis Diner Ltd, to pay Miss M Simpson £1,173.00 and Miss D Robinson £2,346.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found it just and equitable for Miss M Simpson to receive a redundancy payment under section 164(2)(b) ERA 1996 and ordered payment of £1,173.00. | Upheld | — | £1,173 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found it just and equitable for Miss D Robinson to receive a redundancy payment under section 164(2)(b) ERA 1996 and ordered payment of £2,346.00. | Upheld | — | £2,346 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,519
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- section 164(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.