Case 1808071/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L George v Scarborough Waterpark Hotel Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808071/2023
- Decision date
- 1 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss L George
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss L George, brought a claim against Scarborough Waterpark Hotel Limited and Benchmark Leisure (In Administration). The Tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying claim.
By letter dated 17 April 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant failed to make representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary award or other remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was struck out because the Tribunal considered it had no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.