Case 1808527/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Cumberland v The Abbeyfield York Society Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1808527/2018
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Cumberland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms J Cumberland's claim after concluding that it had not been actively pursued. The reasons record that the Claimant had not responded to the Respondent's application dated 5 May 2021 to strike out the claim, despite indicating on that date that she would resist the application.
By a letter dated 17 September 2021, the tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out and to request a hearing if she wished the issue to be decided orally. The Claimant did not respond to that letter. The tribunal said that it appeared the claim had not been actively pursued and therefore ordered that the claim be struck out.
No substantive determination of liability or remedy was made. The judgment records only the procedural strike-out and contains no award of compensation or other monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim in the text provided; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.