Case 1808528/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Ehsan v Markazi Jamiat Ahl – E – Hadith — 2019
- Case reference
- 1808528/2018
- Decision date
- 10 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Ehsan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds on 9-10 January 2019, Employment Judge JM Wade heard the claimant's complaints against Markazi Jamiat Ahl – E – Hadith. The judgment records that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages succeeded, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay him £5,800.
The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed. The extracted judgment does not set out further reasons or a separate breakdown of the award beyond the single sum of £5,800 for the successful unlawful deductions claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages succeeded and awarded £5,800. | Upheld | — | £5,800 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,800
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.