Case 1808580/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Meek v MGG Developments Co Ltd (in liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808580/2023
- Decision date
- 17 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Meek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made under Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure rule 21. The respondent had failed to present a response, and Employment Judge Davies recorded that the claims could properly be determined on the information available.
Claim 1800885/2024 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. In claim 1808580/2023, the tribunal declared that Mrs H Meek was entitled to a redundancy payment of £10,609.50.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 to 17 October 2023 was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay gross wages of £1,443.62.
The claimant's claim for pay in lieu of 29 days' accrued but untaken holiday, and her breach of contract claim in respect of notice pay, were also well-founded and succeeded. The tribunal ordered gross sums of £3,346.02 for holiday pay and £7,915.44 for notice pay, with the claimant responsible for any tax payable.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | In claim 1808580/2023, the tribunal declared that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £10,609.50. | Upheld | — | £10,610 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unauthorised deduction from wages complaint for 1 to 17 October 2023 was well-founded and succeeded. | Upheld | — | £1,444 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for pay in lieu of 29 days' accrued but untaken holiday was well-founded and succeeded. | Upheld | — | £3,346 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim in respect of notice pay was well-founded and succeeded. The extracted text shows the figure as '£7.915.44', which appears to correspond to £7,915.44, but the punctuation is unclear. | Upheld | — | £7,915 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23,315
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.