Case 1808581/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Parkin v MGG Developments Co Ltd (in liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808581/2023
- Decision date
- 17 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Parkin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 because the Respondent had failed to present a response and Employment Judge Davies considered that the claims could properly be determined on the information available. Claim 1800886/2024 was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant.
In claim 1808581/2023, the Tribunal declared that Ms H Parkin was entitled to a redundancy payment of 3,660.39. Her complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 to 17 October 2023 was well-founded and succeeded, with a gross award of 1,026.88.
The Tribunal also held that the claim for pay in lieu of 15 days' accrued but untaken holiday and the breach of contract claim in respect of notice pay were well-founded and succeeded. The Respondent was ordered to pay gross sums of 1,673 for holiday pay and 7,149.96 for notice pay. The judgment recorded that the Claimant is responsible for paying any tax payable.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | In claim 1808581/2023, the Tribunal declared that the Claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £5,660 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 to 17 October 2023 was well-founded and succeeded. | Upheld | — | £1,027 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for pay in lieu of 15 days' accrued but untaken holiday was well-founded and succeeded. | Upheld | — | £1,673 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was in respect of notice pay and was well-founded and succeeded. | Upheld | — | £7,150 |
| Other | Claim 1800886/2024 was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant; the judgment does not identify its subject matter. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,510
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.