Case 1808585/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Taylor-Scaife v MGG Developments Co Ltd (in liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808585/2023
- Decision date
- 17 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Taylor-Scaife
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made under Rule 21 because the Respondent failed to present a response and the Employment Judge considered that the claims could properly be determined on the information available. The separate claim numbered 1800879/2024 was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant.
In claim 1808585/2023, the tribunal declared that Mr T Taylor-Scaife was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,215. It also found well-founded and successful his complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for 1 to 17 October 2023, his claim for pay in lieu of 43.4 days' accrued but untaken holiday, and his breach of contract claim in respect of notice pay.
The tribunal recorded the Claimant's gross weekly wage as £704, calculated from a gross monthly wage of £3,050.66 multiplied by 12 and divided by 52. It ordered the Respondent to pay gross sums of £1,672.94 for wages, £6,110.28 for holiday pay, and £5,632 for notice pay, with any tax payable being the Claimant's responsibility.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment declared the Claimant entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,215 in claim 1808585/2023. | Upheld | — | £3,215 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unauthorised deduction from wages complaint covered the period 1 to 17 October 2023 and succeeded. | Upheld | — | £1,673 |
| Holiday pay | The claim was for pay in lieu of 43.4 days' accrued but untaken holiday and succeeded. | Upheld | — | £6,110 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was in respect of notice pay and succeeded. | Upheld | — | £5,632 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,630
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.