Case 1808617/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Smith v Sansha (UK) Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 1808617/2018
- Decision date
- 27 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Mrs K Smith succeeded on all of the heads recorded in the extracted text against Sansha (UK) Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,750.00 net. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,500.00 damages.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,818.80. It held that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £223.71. The tribunal also found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded £9,300.56 in compensation.
The hearing listed for 6 December 2018 was cancelled. On the figures recorded in the judgment, the total of the monetary awards ordered is £15,593.07. No discrimination claims or specific legal tests were identified in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £1,750.00. | Upheld | — | £1,750 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,500.00. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,818.80. | Upheld | — | £2,819 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £223.71. | Upheld | — | £224 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded £9,300.56 in compensation. | Upheld | — | £9,301 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,593
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £9,301
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.