Case 1808657/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Bouse v Quicktan Sunbeds — 2019
- Case reference
- 1808657/2018
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Bouse
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 52 judgment on withdrawal. The only substantive order recorded is that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
No findings were made on liability, no remedy was assessed, and the short extracted text does not record any substantive reasoning on the underlying dispute. The judgment is therefore limited to the procedural disposal of the case after withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive claim findings are set out in the text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.