Case 1808707/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Chase Recruitment Group Ltd T/a Change Hospitality — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808707/2023
- Decision date
- 24 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Morgan Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge P Morgan, sitting at Leeds by CVP on 23 May 2024, heard the Claimant's complaints against Chase Recruitment Group Ltd (formerly Change Hospitality Hub Ltd, which changed its name on 31 October 2023 and previously traded as Change Hospitality). The Claimant appeared in person; the Respondent did not attend.
The tribunal found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant for accrued but untaken statutory annual leave on termination and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,170.11. A separate complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (the back-pay claim) was found not to be well-founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal further found that the Respondent had failed to provide the Claimant with any pay statements, and ordered payment of £638.85 in respect of unnotified deductions from pay, calculated as the difference between total payment for hours worked and net pay into the Claimant's bank account for the 13 weeks immediately preceding the claim. The grand total ordered was £1,808.96.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Complaint that the Respondent failed to pay accrued but untaken statutory annual leave on termination was well-founded. | Upheld | — | £1,170 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The back-pay claim of unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent failed to provide any pay statements; award reflects unnotified deductions from pay for the 13 weeks immediately preceding the claim (difference between total payment for hours worked and net pay into the Claimant's bank account). | Upheld | — | £639 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,809
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.