Case 1808776/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Faal v Sbfm — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808776/2023
- Decision date
- 22 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F Faal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the claimant's claim for a redundancy payment. On 5 March 2024 it wrote to Miss F Faal warning that the claim might be struck out because she had not worked for SBFM for 2 years or more, and invited her to object in writing or request a hearing within 7 days.
The claimant did not respond. On that basis, the tribunal found that she appeared not to have worked for the respondent for 2 years or more and therefore could not claim a redundancy payment. It struck out the redundancy payment claim.
No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal wrote on 5 March 2024 warning that the redundancy payment claim might be struck out because the claimant had not worked for the respondent for 2 years or more. The claimant did not respond. The tribunal said it appeared she had not worked for the respondent for 2 years or more and could not therefore claim a redundancy payment. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.