Case 1808794/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Robinson v Shaws Waste Recycling Limited (in compulsory liquidation) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808794/2023
- Decision date
- 9 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Robinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing on 9 July 2024, could not be contacted by telephone, and did not respond to an email. The first respondent was in compulsory liquidation, and no consent to continue the proceedings had been sought after the six-month stay issued on 23 February 2024. On that basis, and because the claimant was absent, the tribunal dismissed the claim.
On the redundancy payment issue, the judge recorded that a claimant must first establish dismissal before the redundancy provisions in sections 163(2) or 170(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 can apply. The ET1 raised a possible issue whether the claimant had been dismissed or had resigned without notice. The claimant said his termination date was 7 April 2023 and he started a new job on 17 April 2023. The winding-up petition was not presented until 18 May 2023 and the winding up did not commence until 19 July 2023, so the judge noted it was possible that he had resigned in anticipation of losing his job. The claim was presented on 1 December 2023, more than six months after termination, so any redundancy payment claim against the former employer would have required a just and equitable extension under sections 164(2) and (3).
The judge also noted that the claimant had applied to the National Insurance Fund for statutory redundancy payment and notice pay under sections 166 and 182 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The Second Respondent's response suggested that the decision refusing payments, apart from holiday pay, was notified on or about 30 October 2023, so the notice-pay claim appeared to be in time under section 188(2). Even so, because the claimant did not attend and did not prove the necessary elements of the claim, the tribunal dismissed the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal said a redundancy payment claim first required the claimant to establish that he had been dismissed. It noted a possible issue whether he had been dismissed or had resigned without notice, and dismissed the claim when he did not attend and did not prove the necessary elements. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal referred to the claimant's application for statutory notice pay under section 182 ERA 1996 against the Secretary of State and noted that the notification of refusal appeared to make the notice-pay claim in time under section 188(2). The claim was nevertheless dismissed because the claimant did not attend and did not prove the necessary elements. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- sections 163(2) and 170(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- sections 164(2) and (3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- sections 166 and 182 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 188(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.