Case 1808820/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Hines v Amazon UK Services Ltd HELD AT: Leeds By CVP — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808820/2023
- Decision date
- 13 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Hines
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr O Hines brought an unfair dismissal complaint against Amazon UK Services Ltd. The case was heard by Employment Judge JM Wade at Leeds by CVP on 13 May 2024, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint to have been presented within the section 111(2)(a) time limit, and that it was not presented within that limit. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment records that the proceedings were at an end. No monetary award is recorded and no separate remedy assessment is set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on limitation grounds: the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the unfair dismissal complaint to have been presented within the section 111(2)(a) time limit, and it was not so presented. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.111(2)(a) ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.