Case 1808924/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Wallis v Rangzaib Akhtar — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808924/2023
- Decision date
- 1 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Wallis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent failed to present a response. On the information available, Employment Judge Davies determined that the claim could properly be decided without a hearing on the merits.
Mr S Wallis’s complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for the period October to November 2023 was found to be well-founded. The tribunal ordered Rangzaib Akhtar to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,453.50.
The judgment states that, if any tax is payable on that sum, the claimant is responsible for paying it. No other claims, remedies, or legal tests are recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for October-November 2023 well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £1,454 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,454
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,454
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.