Case 1808925/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v R Akhtar — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808925/2023
- Decision date
- 5 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The Respondent did not present a response, and the tribunal said it could properly determine the claim on the information available.
The tribunal found that the Claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £965.
The judgment also recorded that, if any tax was payable, the Claimant was responsible for paying it. No other claims, findings, or remedy components were set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the Respondent did not present a response; the tribunal described the complaint as a complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages and awarded the gross sum of £965. | Upheld | — | £965 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £965
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £965
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.