Case 1808928/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Shafique v A&A Medical Ltd and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1808928/2023
- Decision date
- 18 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs H Shafique
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs H Shafique brought claims against A&A Medical Ltd and 1PhysioUK Ltd. The only issue determined in this judgment was limitation and jurisdiction. Employment Judge Davies recorded that the claim had not been presented within the time limit in the Employment Rights Act 1996, but found that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and that it was presented within a reasonable period thereafter.
On that basis, the Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to hear the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying unpaid wages issue, nor does it record any remedy award. It is therefore a preliminary jurisdiction decision only.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment deals only with limitation and jurisdiction. The Tribunal held the claim was presented out of time under the Employment Rights Act 1996, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time and that it was presented within a reasonable period, so the Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the claim. No substantive liability decision is recorded in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.