Case 1809015/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Ingham v R Greaves Developments Limited HELD in Sheffield by CVP — 2025
- Case reference
- 1809015/2023
- Decision date
- 27 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Ingham
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 27 January 2025, Employment Judge Brain sitting in Sheffield by CVP heard the claim against R Greaves Developments Limited, which did not attend or take part. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered repayment of £1,673.07, the amount of the deduction.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered repayment of the deducted sum. | Upheld | — | £1,673 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the respondent summarily dismissed the claimant in circumstances where he was not liable to be dismissed without notice and awarded one week’s gross pay. | Upheld | — | £558 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for compensation for holiday accrued but untaken as at termination was dismissed because the claimant had exhausted his accrued holiday entitlement before the termination date. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The redundancy payment claim was refused because the claimant had insufficient qualifying service at the date of termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,231
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.