Case 1809042/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Carter v Mike Northern HELD at Leeds by CVP — 2024
- Case reference
- 1809042/2023
- Decision date
- 22 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Carter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr B Carter, did not attend the hearing on 15 May 2024 and was not represented. Employment Judge Shulman dismissed the claim on non-attendance under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013.
The reasons record that the respondent attended in person, but it was explained that he did not have standing because his response was late. The tribunal noted that there was very little information in the claim, which was apparently for holiday pay.
The claimant had been asked by email on 10 April 2024 to provide more information to the tribunal and did not do so. The tribunal also noted that he could not be contacted on the hearing day because he had not put his telephone number on the claim form. In all the circumstances, the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claim was dismissed on non-attendance by the claimant pursuant to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013. The judgment says there was very little information in the claim, which was apparently for holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.